The Distribution Problem
Another large reason that bourbon can be viewed as broken is the three-tier distribution system in this country. Unfortunately, we can’t do too much about the system. It is what it is. By law, the distillers have to sell to the distributors. Those distributors often then hold the liquor stores or restaurants hostage. They force them to buy X number of cases of Fireball or Wheatley Vodka just to get the opportunity to purchase one bottle of Pappy or a few BTAC bottles (just an example).
Then your local store is forced to buy product that they don’t want and that doesn’t sell just to get a few bottles of what EVERYONE wants. This creates even more problems for the liquor stores. Consumers are at the mercy of this system and there isn’t really a fix for it. There is so much money involved in this that I don’t see the system changing anytime in the near future. I don’t see a way to easily fix this problem. But that brings me to the problem that impacts us all the most.
The Retail Problem
Some handle it fairly, some handle it poorly, and some are borderline criminal. Again, I’m all for a free market. But just because a store has a bottle, doesn’t mean you should blindly support them. Ask yourself some questions. How do they treat their customers? How do they treat their regulars? Does your local store have a VIP program? How do they handle that? Is it fair? As a customer, the most important thing you can do is vote with your dollar. The only way you can make an impact on stores that participate in some of these shady business practices is to refuse to shop there. Every market is different but let me give you a few examples of some stores near me.
One local chain basically holds most of their allocated bottles back to flip them on the secondary market for a larger profit and openly admit it if you get the right employee talking. The few crumbs they do make available are marked up 50-100% of MSRP. Why would you give a local business your money if they treat you like this? I refuse to shop at their stores and will go out of my way to shop somewhere else.
There is another larger liquor store chain here locally that rewards spending. I can’t find fault in this practice. They are in business to make money. I will also say that on the whole, this is cheapest priced store in town with a large selection. They track their customers spending and their customers are rewarded for it. The managers at each store have the discretion to reward their biggest spenders as they see fit. They have relationships that have sometimes been cultivated for years and have spent thousands and sometimes tens of thousands of dollars a year with them. Let’s say you spend an average of $120/month at your local store. Do you really think you should get that BTAC bottle you want over the guy who spends $30,000/year? This store is the closest to where I live and I’m a regular.
"Some handle it fairly, some handle it poorly, and some are borderline criminal. Again, I’m all for a free market. But just because a store has a bottle, doesn’t mean you should blindly support them."
"This isn’t the way you should treat your customers, but people just keep lining up to keep bourbon broken."
Then I was discussing it with a friend of mine who called me and asked if I had gotten the email. I looked at the email again and something just didn’t sit right with me. You see, this retailer got sponsors for this event/charity raffle/promotion. Not a big deal on the surface at first glance. But if you think about it, they got two sponsors, and unless things have changed in the world, sponsors pay. So now this retailer is getting paid to put the sponsor brands/logos on this email. I would imagine that the retailer would recoup most or all of the cost of the 30 bottles of Col. Taylor that are to be used in this raffle from this sponsorship. Now, I’m not a wholesaler but if the MSRP of these bottles is $65, I can’t imagine their cost from the distributor is over $55. If that’s the case, the retailer has maybe $1650 into this promo that would be out of pocket before any sponsorship money was received. Still, not an issue for me until you get to the part that you don’t actually win the bottle, you still have to pay the retailer for the bottle, in person, at one of their locations. Bottle payments do not go directly to the named charity. Now top of that, the retailer will get to take a tax write off for the donation to the charity. Correct me if I’m wrong but this seems like a triple dip to me and comes off as more than a bit shady. Basically the retailer is getting paid for the product twice (once from the sponsors and again from the raffle winners) and taking the tax write off too! Also, just four hours after the email was sent, the retailer had already sold over 900 tickets. The raffle is selling tickets for a week. That will be a nice tax write off for this company. I’m not trying to start a whole thing here, but this doesn’t seem right to me. I asked 9 different people about their thoughts on this and every one of them thought the same thing.
Now if this were an actual raffle where you paid for a ticket and won the bottle, I wouldn’t have an issue at all. These raffles happen all the time for both charity and sometimes for profit. You see this all the time, buy a ticket to win a bottle of Pappy 23. Not the right to buy a bottle. This seems more like a “right to buy” lottery where you buy a ticket and the real winner is the retailer, then the charity. This isn’t the way you should treat your customers, but people just keep lining up to keep bourbon broken.
Let me know what you think about my thoughts so far in the comments, and stay tuned for the next installment of Is Bourbon Broken? – The Consumer Problem Revisited.
Brent was born and raised in Indianapolis, IN. After graduating from the University of Kansas with a degree in Journalism, he moved back to Indy where he eventually resurrected his family's brand of all beef kosher style hot dogs and opened a restaurant, King David Dogs, in downtown Indianapolis. When he's not juggling the many duties of an entrepreneur, he can usually be found relaxing at home with his wife, their twin boys, and their two dogs. Brent is a member of the Bourbon Society of Indianapolis, a BBQ enthusiast, and a cigar aficionado. Three things that are even better when enjoyed together with good friends. If Brent is not talking about bourbon, he's probably talking about sports, in particular, NFL football and Kansas Jayhawks basketball. You can follow his blog, BBQ and Bourbon here.
Read Brent's full profile.
We have a handful of stores here that do it fairly. Option 1: You sign up for their newsletter, a few times a year they do a “lottery” where all you have to do is click on the bottles that interest you (one, some, or all), and then you’re entered into a drawing. No cost up front. You win the drawing, you get to buy the bottle at retail.
Option 2: A store puts all of its allocated bottles up for charity. There are 52 spots on a board unique for that bottle, each representing a playing card from a standard deck. Tickets cost a different amount for whatever is up there (usually between $5 and $20 a spot). When all the spots are sold, a livestream of the card being picked is shown and the winner gets the bottle.
I’m good for either of those situations. They’re both very fair, if you’re a customer, you get your shot.
I’ve read all 3 installments and they are spot on. If I didn’t know that you were in Indianapolis, I would have thought you were writing about the bourbon market in Lower Fairfield County, CT.
I just forwarded all these articles to the owner of the only place I shop. His store gets an A+ in all the categories mentioned in article three for sure and I feel lucky to live here in Central Massachusetts and to have been able to develop a relationship with him and his store over the years. But, unfortunately, his store is the exception now and not the rule. I cannot believe what I see when I travel around. My all time favorite was a bottle of PVW15 at the liquor store right around the corner from the Peninsula Hotel in Manhattan for $15,999.99. Honestly, it was the 99 cents that killed me. I guess the main theme here is that everyone who shows up late to the party gets the cops called. I have been telling people at classes I’ve done and just folks I’ve talked to that if you don’t pay the secondary market it will go away. Not right away, but it won’t last if it is neglected. I also tell them never chase bottles because there is always another one coming right behind it. Anyway, I’m sure I’m preaching to the choir here.I really appreciated this all being put down on “paper” here. I wish it would make a difference.
To many people are making to much money doing this, here in NV where I am some places do a good job with this and some don’t. It is my humble opinion that until people stop paying these prices it will just not stop .But as my Father used to say Money Talks and BS Walks.
It’s always the people that cause all the problems. 😉
I think bourbon is broken. As a retired person on a fairly fixed income I am unable and most definitely unwilling to pay the prices asked. I now attempt to support local distilleries even if their prices are a little higher than the big companies or distributors. I find the local products can be as tasty or tastier than the majors.
There is no problem, things are working as they should. This is a free-market society and I believe it should operate as such. If someone wants to pay $200+ for Blanton’s, let them. It’s their money. While it means less for those who are only willing to pay $50, then there are tons of alternatives for you that are equally delicious without the name-brand. Go find them. And if that one also gets too expensive guess what, another distillery will open to sell you amazing bourbon for $50 again. That’s how an economy works, scarcity leads to more of something. Plenty of amazing tasting bourbon to go around now, and always, at affordable prices.